Talk:Imperial Cutter/@comment-31.46.251.244-20151123164417/@comment-95.45.48.113-20151127023711
Hehe, this guy trying to say the Cutter is easy pray is so clearly bitter about never being able to own one and is trying to make excuses to feel better.
But one thing I must correct about what you said in one of your posts - The cutter *is* meant to be a warship, not a trader. FD have specifically said on stream that it's meant to be the Imperial *Navy's* equivilant to the corvette. It wouldn't be fair if only one side got a warship while the other side is stuck with a trader and forced to fly the enemy's ships instead. They're both meant to be combat orientated versions of the anaconda, but they screwed up the design of the cutter and made it way too good at trading when it's non-combat uses are only meant to extend to diplomatic and support roles. Something I truly hope they remidy before 2.0's release. I dread the thought of what will essentially be army tanks used as inter-city taxi cabs...
Start a discussion about Imperial Cutter/@comment-31.46.251.244-20151123164417/@comment-95.45.48.113-20151127023711
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Elite Dangerous Wiki the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Imperial Cutter/@comment-31.46.251.244-20151123164417/@comment-95.45.48.113-20151127023711.