Board Thread:Council of Admirals/@comment-4555143-20150719161215/@comment-4555143-20150722202118
 | This article has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articlesTemplate:Stub other. (November 2026) |
| This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles. (November 2026) |
Rhea why do you seem so hostile lately though? I mean, if the policy is made stricter then that makes it easier for the pages to be determined if in violation or not. The looser the policy, the harder it is to determine the validity. As it stands, the current group policy is upto an editor's interpretation.
Does "should have had some official acknowledgement" mean they must have it, or does it mean it'd be highly beneficial if they did. And what amount of players is above arbitrary? With a stricter set of guidelines to use, editors are able to clearly see if a page is in violation. This is how pages speculating upcoming content are kept from existing, because without an official source of information, one has no way of knowing if it's true or not making it pure speculation until proven otherwise.
With those 2 things being the sole criteria for groups atm, that makes it really varied in how the editors will look at them. Whereas if there are more strict guidelines