User contributions for 69.114.195.0/24
6 August 2018
- 13:1113:11, 6 August 2018 diff hist +254 N Talk:Federal Assault Ship/@comment-69.114.195.213-20180806131101 69.114.195.213 talk Created page with "Top notch combat ship! This ship is a behemoth in size yet has great handling and lots of armor. It may have the least firepower of the three federal piggies, but you can just..." current
22 July 2018
- 00:4600:46, 22 July 2018 diff hist +41 N Talk:Federal Gunship/@comment-2003:72:4D11:F33B:E8B2:D5B0:53D1:1F43-20171012020510/@comment-69.114.195.213-20180722004615 69.114.195.213 talk Created page with "No you don't. I know because I own a FGS. " current
20 June 2018
- 03:0003:00, 20 June 2018 diff hist +128 N Talk:Alliance Chieftain/@comment-68.116.31.250-20180413165927/@comment-69.114.195.213-20180620030025 69.114.195.213 talk Created page with "The Taipan folds up when inside the hangar. When the Taipan is folded up, it is roughly the same size as the other two fighters." current
18 June 2018
- 16:2516:25, 18 June 2018 diff hist +90 N Talk:Alliance Challenger/@comment-33952827-20180601102727/@comment-69.114.195.213-20180618162504 69.114.195.213 talk Created page with "According to the article, the Challenger is slightly more maneuverable than the Chieftain." current
5 June 2018
- 02:0302:03, 5 June 2018 diff hist +150 N Talk:Imperial Cutter/@comment-2A02:587:3508:5400:2985:741E:6EA2:5F23-20180523104608/@comment-69.114.195.213-20180605020312 69.114.195.213 talk Created page with "Not a trade ship? I mean, it’s a good combat ship but not a good trade ship? What else could its extra class 8 slot be used for besides a fuel tank?" current