Nanomedicines: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

Vitadyne Labs nanomeds' smooth path to approval was interrupted on December 28, when Simguru [[Pranav Antal]] issued a statement claiming that the nanomeds had been developed by [[Utopia]] and used exclusively among its members for decades, and Vitadyne Labs had likely stolen a shipment of them from a medical transport several months prior and were pawning them off as their own product. Professor Katrien Rook and Vitadyne Labs did not comment on the accusations, but the IHO pledged to investigate.<ref>[https://community.elitedangerous.com/en/galnet/uid/5c25f62cd168ed61df30a0f0 GalNet: Antal Levels Accusation at Vitadyne]</ref>

Professor Rook revealed on January 3, 3305 that Vitadyne Labs had not, in fact, invented its new nanomedicine, but had not committed a crime either. Rook stated that a group of independent pilots had found the crash site of the missing Utopian medical transport, and Vitadyne Labs had purchased the Utopian nanomeds as legitimate salvage and then used them to create a derivative type of nanomed. While Rook offered to return the original salvaged nanomeds to Utopia with Vitadyne's apologies, she insisted that Vitdyne had the right to continue to produce the derivatives. Pranav Antal quickly responded by demanding the derivatives be handed over to Utopia as well, and reasserted that Utopian technology could not be used by anyone outside the organization. The IHO announced that it would review the case and render a decision on the nanomeds' ownership.<ref>[https://community.elitedangerous.com/en/galnet/uid/5c2a001986a66548a766dc9b GalNet: Vitadyne Admits Nanomeds of Utopian Origin]</ref>

== References ==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Vitadyne Labs nanomeds' smooth path to approval was interrupted on December 28, when Simguru [[Pranav Antal]] issued a statement claiming that the nanomeds had been developed by [[Utopia]] and used exclusively among its members for decades, and Vitadyne Labs had likely stolen a shipment of them from a medical transport several months prior and were pawning them off as their own product. Professor Katrien Rook and Vitadyne Labs did not comment on the accusations, but the IHO pledged to investigate.<ref>[https://community.elitedangerous.com/en/galnet/uid/5c25f62cd168ed61df30a0f0 GalNet: Antal Levels Accusation at Vitadyne]</ref>
+Professor Rook revealed on January 3, 3305 that Vitadyne Labs had not, in fact, invented its new nanomedicine, but had not committed a crime either. Rook stated that a group of independent pilots had found the crash site of the missing Utopian medical transport, and Vitadyne Labs had purchased the Utopian nanomeds as legitimate salvage and then used them to create a derivative type of nanomed. While Rook offered to return the original salvaged nanomeds to Utopia with Vitadyne's apologies, she insisted that Vitdyne had the right to continue to produce the derivatives. Pranav Antal quickly responded by demanding the derivatives be handed over to Utopia as well, and reasserted that Utopian technology could not be used by anyone outside the organization. The IHO announced that it would review the case and render a decision on the nanomeds' ownership.<ref>[https://community.elitedangerous.com/en/galnet/uid/5c2a001986a66548a766dc9b GalNet: Vitadyne Admits Nanomeds of Utopian Origin]</ref>
 == References ==

Nanomedicines: Difference between revisions

Fandom>Clockpuncher