Jump to content

Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26009169-20151231154249/@comment-26536231-20160109200505: Difference between revisions

From Elite Dangerous Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "<div class="quote">JazHaz wrote:<br />I've been ill for a couple of weeks, so haven't been posting much. However I still stand by my view that the larger ships, due to low man..."
 
Maintenance: Add Uncategorized banner; Add Orphan banner
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Uncategorized|date=November 2026}}
{{Orphan|date=November 2026}}
<div class="quote">JazHaz wrote:<br />I've been ill for a couple of weeks, so haven't been posting much. However I still stand by my view that the larger ships, due to low manoeuvrability, shouldn't be included in the suggested ships.
<div class="quote">JazHaz wrote:<br />I've been ill for a couple of weeks, so haven't been posting much. However I still stand by my view that the larger ships, due to low manoeuvrability, shouldn't be included in the suggested ships.



Latest revision as of 03:58, 1 November 2026

JazHaz wrote:
I've been ill for a couple of weeks, so haven't been posting much. However I still stand by my view that the larger ships, due to low manoeuvrability, shouldn't be included in the suggested ships.

However, I will concede that this is a personal view, and other people may not agree.

I suggest that we remove the "suggested ships" section from the side box as a way forward.

Asteroids are at least 300m apart and the biggest ships are waaaaaaaaaaaaay below that. I can happily boost around in RES and shoot pirates in a Cutter. Why shouldn't I be able to do slowpoke chill mining instead? (without that boosting part...)