Elite Dangerous Wiki:Dispute: Difference between revisions
Bot: Automated import of articles |
Localise template catalogue and editorial guidance for the independent wiki |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Shortcut|ED:DISPUTE}} |
{{Shortcut|ED:DISPUTE}} |
||
Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on |
Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. When a dispute takes place, the article should be restored to how it was before the edits. |
||
When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the |
When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. The discussion should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect. |
||
When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place. |
When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place. |
||
Revision as of 09:17, 31 October 2026
Whenever there is a dispute between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. When a dispute takes place, the article should be restored to how it was before the edits.
When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. The discussion should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.
When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place.