Category talk:Candidates for deletion: Difference between revisions
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[User:SqueakySquak|SqueakySquak]] ([[User talk:SqueakySquak|talk]]) 15:49, May 3, 2015 (UTC) | [[User:SqueakySquak|SqueakySquak]] ([[User talk:SqueakySquak|talk]]) 15:49, May 3, 2015 (UTC) | ||
Useful information should not be wiped off the wiki. Were we to follow the line that if information cannot possibly be complete, we would have to get rid of all the [[Star Systems|star systems]] as well and probably several other pages, which is unreasonable. The RES list is clearly of use to some users: when I cut the location list completely from the [[Resource Extraction Site|main article]] users felt the need to complain for good reason in the comments section, and new locations keep getting submitted to the list as well. The second part of the reason for deletion, stated as "a very small minority will have no use with the list," is entirely nonsensical to me. [[File:icon_vulture.png|baseline]]'''[[User:Leo_McCoy|Leo_McCoy]]''' ([[User talk:Leo_McCoy|talk]]) 17:11, May 3, 2015 (UTC) | Useful information should not be wiped off the wiki. Were we to follow the line that if information cannot possibly be complete, we would have to get rid of all the [[Star Systems|star systems]] as well and probably several other pages, which is unreasonable. The RES list is clearly of use to some users: when I cut the location list completely from the [[Resource Extraction Site|main article]] users felt the need to complain for good reason in the comments section, and new locations keep getting submitted to the list as well. The second part of the reason for deletion, stated as "a very small minority will have no use with the list," is entirely nonsensical to me. —[[File:icon_vulture.png|baseline]]'''[[User:Leo_McCoy|Leo_McCoy]]''' ([[User talk:Leo_McCoy|talk]]) 17:11, May 3, 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:12, 3 May 2015
Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion.
Imperial Courier
Unless Frountier has explictly said the Clipper is the replacement to the Courier I wouldn't delete it, the Courier is a fairly iconic ship, and while the Clipper is equiverlent in size to the old Courier they may yet add the Courier in, we currently only have 13 of the total 30 ships they are aiming for. That said until they do release a Courier this page would be fairly blank anyway.
Edit: Also come people have been diging around the folder structure and found that the Clipper has a folder name of Empire Trader, so it could very well be a replacement for the Imperial Trader rather then the Courier: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=54137&p=936578&viewfull=1#post936578
:) Skid :) 11:23, November 25, 2014 (UTC)
Imperial Courier (delete Empire Courier)
Rename the thread Imperial Courier now ,if there's to be any change.
I cannot say for certain, but I imagine the Courier is coming, it's not the same as the Imperial Clipper.
Also note, they call that ship the "Imperial Clipper" ingame.
Also ,-if- the Courier is launched further down the line, I imagine they'll call it Imperial Courier, like it was in Elite 2 : Frontier ,and Elite 3 : First Encounter
So, feel free to delete "Empire Courier" but replace it with , "Imperial Courier, and mark it as a proposed upcoming ship for Elite Dangerous. Also perhaps add the description text from the original games perhaps?
List of Rare Commodities
Yes, the category is autopopulating. However, the list is currently incomplete and this list adds useful information to what is in the category page.
Itchü (talk) 11:18, January 15, 2015 (UTC)
You may be right to point that is may profit only a small number of people, so it probably should not be on Wikia. However much like for a lot of things in that game, I don't think it's impossible to list them all, and if I can, I will. Maybe a tool to list them all would be more appropriate.
SqueakySquak (talk) 15:49, May 3, 2015 (UTC)
Useful information should not be wiped off the wiki. Were we to follow the line that if information cannot possibly be complete, we would have to get rid of all the star systems as well and probably several other pages, which is unreasonable. The RES list is clearly of use to some users: when I cut the location list completely from the main article users felt the need to complain for good reason in the comments section, and new locations keep getting submitted to the list as well. The second part of the reason for deletion, stated as "a very small minority will have no use with the list," is entirely nonsensical to me. —File:Icon vulture.pngLeo_McCoy (talk) 17:11, May 3, 2015 (UTC)
