Jump to content

Elite Dangerous Wiki:Dispute: Difference between revisions

From Elite Dangerous Wiki
Content deleted Content added
Localise template catalogue and editorial guidance for the independent wiki
Align dispute guidance with local standards against edit warring
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|ED:DISPUTE}}
{{Shortcut|ED:DISPUTE}}
Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. When a dispute takes place, the article should be restored to how it was before the edits.
Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. Do not repeatedly revert a disputed change. Discuss the wording and evidence on the article talk page, following [[Project:Community standards]] and [[Project:Consensus]].


When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. The discussion should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.
When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. The discussion should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.

Revision as of 09:18, 31 October 2026

Whenever there is a dispute between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. Do not repeatedly revert a disputed change. Discuss the wording and evidence on the article talk page, following Project:Community standards and Project:Consensus.

When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. The discussion should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.

When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place.