Armour Hardness: Difference between revisions
included Ratings for ships |
added Kestrel and Lynx |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Armour Hardness''' is | '''Armour Hardness''', also known as '''Armour Rating''', is an innate characteristic of a [[Ships|ship's]] hull that determines how damage from specific weapons will be inflicted on the hull of the target. In general, larger ships tend to have high Armour Hardness values, while smaller ships tend to have low Armour Hardness values. This value is specific to each model of ship, and cannot be improved or otherwise altered through [[Outfitting]] or [[Engineers|Engineering]] options. | ||
== Effect on Damage == | |||
If a weapon's Pierce Rating is higher than the targeted ship's Hardness Rating, then it will deal its full damage to the hull of the targeted ship. If the Pierce Rating is lower than the Hardness Rating, then damage will be calculated as follows: | |||
<math>\text{Dealt Damage to Hull} = \text{Weapon Damage} \times \frac{\text{Weapon Armour Pierce Rating}}{\text{Ship Armour Hardness Rating}}</math> | |||
This means that a [[Mining Laser]], the weakest of all standard weapon modules with a Pierce Rating of 18, used on a [[Type-10 Defender]] with an Armour Hardness of 75 will inflict only 24% of its total damage potential. The [[Cytoscrambler]], a specialized anti-shield variant of the [[Burst Laser]], performs even more poorly and will inflict only 1.33-5.00% of its damage, rendering it near useless against hulls. | |||
== Armour Hardness Ratings == | == Armour Hardness Ratings == | ||
| Line 6: | Line 13: | ||
!Rating | !Rating | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Type-10 Defender | |[[Type-10 Defender]] | ||
|75 | |75 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Imperial Cutter | |[[Federal Corvette]] | ||
| rowspan=" | | rowspan="6" |70 | ||
|- | |||
|[[Fer-de-Lance]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Imperial Cutter]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Mamba]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Panther Clipper Mk II]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Python Mk II]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Alliance Chieftain]] | |||
| rowspan="7" |65 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Alliance Challenger]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Alliance Crusader]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Anaconda]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Corsair]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Python]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Type-9 Heavy]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Beluga Liner]] | ||
| rowspan="6" |60 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Caspian Explorer]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Federal Assault Ship]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Federal Dropship]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Federal Gunship]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Imperial Clipper]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Type-8 Transporter]] | ||
| rowspan="2" |58 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Type-11 Prospector]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Kestrel Mk II]] | ||
| rowspan="7" |55 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Type-7 Transporter | |[[Krait Mk II]] | ||
|- | |||
|[[Krait Phantom]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Lynx Highliner]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Mandalay]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Orca]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Vulture]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Type-7 Transporter]] | |||
|54 | |54 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Asp Explorer]] | ||
|52 | | rowspan="2" |52 | ||
|- | |||
|[[Asp Scout]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Keelback | |[[Keelback]] | ||
|45 | |45 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Diamondback Explorer | |[[Diamondback Explorer]] | ||
|42 | |42 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Diamondback Scout | |[[Cobra Mk V]] | ||
| | | rowspan="2" |40 | ||
|- | |||
|[[Diamondback Scout]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Adder]] | |||
| rowspan="7" |35 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Cobra Mk III]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Cobra | |[[Cobra Mk IV]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Dolphin]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Type-6 Transporter | |[[Type-6 Transporter]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Viper Mk III]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Viper Mk IV]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Imperial Courier | |[[Imperial Courier]] | ||
|30 | |30 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Eagle]] | ||
| rowspan="2" |28 | | rowspan="2" |28 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Eagle | |[[Imperial Eagle]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Hauler | |[[Hauler]] | ||
| rowspan="2" |20 | | rowspan="2" |20 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Sidewinder | |[[Sidewinder Mk I|Sidewinder]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Armour Pierce Ratings == | == Armour Pierce Ratings == | ||
The Armour Pierce Rating depends type and class of the weapon used | The Armour Pierce Rating depends on the type and class of the weapon used. | ||
{| class="article-table" | |||
! rowspan="8" |Class independent | |||
!Weapon type | |||
!Rating | |||
|- | |||
|[[Mining Laser|Mining Lasers]] | |||
|18 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Mine Launcher|Mines]] | |||
| rowspan="3" |60 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Missile Rack|Missiles]] (normal and [[AX Missile Rack|AX]]) | |||
|- | |||
|[[Remote Release Flak Launcher|Remote Release Flak Launchers]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Plasma Accelerator|Plasma Accelerators]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |100 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Railgun|Railguns]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Torpedo Pylon|Torpedoes]] | |||
|>100 | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="6" |Class dependent | |||
|[[Beam Laser|Beam Lasers]] | |||
|18-60 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Burst Laser|Burst Lasers]] | |||
| rowspan="2" |20-65 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Pulse Laser|Pulse Lasers]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Cannon|Cannons]] | |||
|30-90 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Fragment Cannon|Fragment Cannons]] | |||
|20-45 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Multi-cannon|Multi-Cannons]] | |||
|22-68 | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="2" |Exceptions | |||
|[[Cytoscrambler]] (Burst Laser) | |||
|1 | |||
|- | |||
|[[Enforcer Cannon]] (Multi-Cannon) | |||
|30 | |||
|} | |||
__FORCETOC__ | |||
[[ru:Прочность корпуса]] | |||
[[Category:Gameplay]] | |||
[[Category:Guides]] | |||
Latest revision as of 02:08, 6 May 2026
Armour Hardness, also known as Armour Rating, is an innate characteristic of a ship's hull that determines how damage from specific weapons will be inflicted on the hull of the target. In general, larger ships tend to have high Armour Hardness values, while smaller ships tend to have low Armour Hardness values. This value is specific to each model of ship, and cannot be improved or otherwise altered through Outfitting or Engineering options.
Effect on Damage
If a weapon's Pierce Rating is higher than the targeted ship's Hardness Rating, then it will deal its full damage to the hull of the targeted ship. If the Pierce Rating is lower than the Hardness Rating, then damage will be calculated as follows:
This means that a Mining Laser, the weakest of all standard weapon modules with a Pierce Rating of 18, used on a Type-10 Defender with an Armour Hardness of 75 will inflict only 24% of its total damage potential. The Cytoscrambler, a specialized anti-shield variant of the Burst Laser, performs even more poorly and will inflict only 1.33-5.00% of its damage, rendering it near useless against hulls.
Armour Hardness Ratings
Armour Pierce Ratings
The Armour Pierce Rating depends on the type and class of the weapon used.
| Class independent | Weapon type | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Mining Lasers | 18 | |
| Mines | 60 | |
| Missiles (normal and AX) | ||
| Remote Release Flak Launchers | ||
| Plasma Accelerators | 100 | |
| Railguns | ||
| Torpedoes | >100 | |
| Class dependent | Beam Lasers | 18-60 |
| Burst Lasers | 20-65 | |
| Pulse Lasers | ||
| Cannons | 30-90 | |
| Fragment Cannons | 20-45 | |
| Multi-Cannons | 22-68 | |
| Exceptions | Cytoscrambler (Burst Laser) | 1 |
| Enforcer Cannon (Multi-Cannon) | 30 |