Template:Disputed inline/doc: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
date is not an ISO8601 date, as the "date" type triggers
 
Adapt local policies, template notices and guidance for independent Elite Dangerous Wiki; preserve index layout
 
Line 17:
 
===Articles with disputed statements===
This inline template helps highlight a particular disputed statement or alleged fact, in contrast to the {{tlg|Disputed}} and {{tlg|Disputed section}} templates which mark a whole article or section as disputed. This is particularly helpful when there are reliable sources supporting two or more different claims. ''{{tlg|Disputed inline}} should not be used without also raising the issue on the talk page.'' When used on an article page, the word "disputed" links to [[WikipediaProject:Dispute|Disputed statement]], and the article is placed in [[:Category:Accuracy disputes]] or one of its dated sub-categories. This template is a more strongly worded version of {{tlg|Dubious}}, which indicates a potential dispute, most often a question about reliable sourcing for the statement/fact at issue; {{tlg|Disputed inline}} indicates that at least one editor believes there is no question that the statement has a [[WPElite Dangerous Wiki:Verifiability|verifiability]] problem.
 
===Other pages===
 
If this tag is used outside the article namespace, it will not be categorized in an article cleanup category, and the word "disputed" links to [[WikipediaElite Dangerous Wiki:Consensus|Consensus]]. It can be used to indicate an unresolved dispute and a talk page topic about the dispute, e.g. an issue at a guideline or WikiProject page.
 
For pages other than articles, use {{tlg|Under discussion inline}}, which categorizes differently.