Edwin Espinosa: Difference between revisions
m add ru link |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Timeline == | == Timeline == | ||
22 FEB 3308 | 22 FEB 3308 | ||
*[[President of the Federation|President]] [[Zachary Hudson]]'s proposal to remove the eight-year limit on his term of office has led to public unrest on many [[Federation|Federal]] worlds. Supporters of [[Shadow President]] [[Felicia Winters]] have taken the lead in protesting against the Hudson Contravention, which is currently being debated in [[Federal Congress|Congress]]. The situation has been extensively covered by [[newsfeed]]s across the Federation:<br/>[[Federal Free Press]]: "As always, Felicia Winters is the only grown-up in the room. She has rightfully objected to the sitting president's attempt at throwing away the rulebook. Repealing the [[Federal Accord|77th amendment]] would be a fundamental blow to our millennia-old democracy."<br/>[[Sol Today]]: "What's the choice here? Retain Hudson for a few more years until things calm down, or hand power to Winters and watch the Federal government weaken and collapse under a weight the shadow president cannot possibly bear?"<br/>The [[Federal Times]]: "Moderate Republican voters are taking a dim view of the Hudson Contravention, primarily because it denies them the option to choose a new administration. Vice President [[Jerome Archer]], Secretary of State [[Lana Berkovich]] and Grand Attorney Edwin Espinosa are the most likely presidential candidates, but none of them will be able to run for office in 3309 if Hudson gets his way."<ref>[https://community.elitedangerous.com/galnet/uid/6214dc642c32bc77c62a2e04 GalNet: Hudson Contravention Sparks Federal Protests]</ref> | *[[President of the Federation|President]] [[Zachary Hudson]]'s proposal to remove the eight-year limit on his term of office has led to public unrest on many [[Federation|Federal]] worlds. Supporters of [[Shadow President]] [[Felicia Winters]] have taken the lead in protesting against the [[Hudson Contravention]], which is currently being debated in [[Federal Congress|Congress]]. The situation has been extensively covered by [[newsfeed]]s across the Federation:<br/>[[Federal Free Press]]: "As always, Felicia Winters is the only grown-up in the room. She has rightfully objected to the sitting president's attempt at throwing away the rulebook. Repealing the [[Federal Accord|77th amendment]] would be a fundamental blow to our millennia-old democracy."<br/>[[Sol Today]]: "What's the choice here? Retain Hudson for a few more years until things calm down, or hand power to Winters and watch the Federal government weaken and collapse under a weight the shadow president cannot possibly bear?"<br/>The [[Federal Times]]: "Moderate Republican voters are taking a dim view of the Hudson Contravention, primarily because it denies them the option to choose a new administration. Vice President [[Jerome Archer]], Secretary of State [[Lana Berkovich]] and Grand Attorney Edwin Espinosa are the most likely presidential candidates, but none of them will be able to run for office in 3309 if Hudson gets his way."<ref>[https://community.elitedangerous.com/galnet/uid/6214dc642c32bc77c62a2e04 GalNet: Hudson Contravention Sparks Federal Protests]</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||