<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User_blog%3ADigistruct0r%2FShip_Categorization</id>
	<title>User blog:Digistruct0r/Ship Categorization - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User_blog%3ADigistruct0r%2FShip_Categorization"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=User_blog:Digistruct0r/Ship_Categorization&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-03T03:07:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=User_blog:Digistruct0r/Ship_Categorization&amp;diff=79533&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Fandom&gt;Digistruct0r: Blog post created or updated.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=User_blog:Digistruct0r/Ship_Categorization&amp;diff=79533&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2015-11-25T16:44:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Blog post created or updated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;NOTE: This is mostly about the text that displays under the ship&amp;#039;s profile pic.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So as we all know, ships are divided into several groups on this wiki, and with a new batch coming out in 1.5 I thought some questions should be brought up (and maybe we can make some kind of guideline on this).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So we already have general categorization, which is pretty easy:&lt;br /&gt;
*Fighter&lt;br /&gt;
*Freighter&lt;br /&gt;
*Explorer&lt;br /&gt;
*Cruise/Passenger&lt;br /&gt;
*Multipurpose&lt;br /&gt;
But then additional stuff comes into play, such as size/weight. For expample, the Vulture is marked as a &amp;quot;Heavy Fighter&amp;quot; at the moment, but while having quite a hull mass of 230t (I mean jesus that&amp;#039;s like half the Anaconda) it is really agile and compact, which makes the &amp;quot;heavy&amp;quot; part a little bit obsolete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the weight part needs some sort of revamping, taking the handing into account. I suggest we use the following (feel free to build on that):&lt;br /&gt;
*Small/Light: anything below 100t of hull mass, Sideys, Eagles, Couriers, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
*Normal (basically no prefix): ships of overall medium mass/size/agility (I guess the Vulture would be in here)&lt;br /&gt;
*Heavy: anything not fitting into previous two categories but below 600-700t hull (T9 at 1000t would probably be in this one as an exception, since there&amp;#039;s a much larger Cutter soon to be availiable)&lt;br /&gt;
*Superheavy: top of the range ships, such as Cutter, Corvette and maybe the upcoming Panther Clipper and new huge passenger ship&lt;br /&gt;
But then there are also subcategories, which Frontier themselves seem to distinguish, notably with Asp and Diamondback, but also with Mk3/4 DeLacy ships. We could add those as another prefix such as:&lt;br /&gt;
*Combat (obviously you wouldn&amp;#039;t add that to a Fighter ship, but to an Explorer)&lt;br /&gt;
*Long-range&lt;br /&gt;
*Interceptor (maybe the Imperial Eagle would fall into this category?)&lt;br /&gt;
*... (I need to come up with more of these)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thoughts?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Blog posts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Fandom&gt;Digistruct0r</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>