https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Template%3AUw-unreliableTemplate:Uw-unreliable - Revision history2026-11-01T23:49:07ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.46.2https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Template:Uw-unreliable&diff=131984&oldid=prevWikipedia>Andrybak: fix documentation per Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace#Edit request 15 October 20252025-10-15T19:38:39Z<p>fix documentation per <a href="/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Template_index/User_talk_namespace&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace (page does not exist)">Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace#Edit request 15 October 2025</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{{icon|[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]]}}} Hello, I'm <includeonly>[[User:{{safesub<noinclude></noinclude>st:REVISIONUSER}}|{{safesub<noinclude></noinclude>st:REVISIONUSER}}]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[User:Example|Example]]</noinclude>. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of [[Special:Contributions/{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}|your recent contributions]]{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1|}}}|&#32; to [[:{{{1}}}]], }} you cited a link to a source that may not be [[WP:RS|reliable]]. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. [[WP:SELF|Self-published material]], [[WP:USERG|user-generated content]], and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a [[WP:RSP|list of sources]] that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have [[:Category:WikiProject lists of reliable sources|their own lists]] of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at [[WP:RSN|the reliable sources noticeboard]]. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-unreliable --><noinclude> {{single notice|nothankyou=yes|param1=page name|banners={{Twinkle standard installation}} {{Ultraviolet standard installation|rw=yes}}}} </noinclude></div>Wikipedia>Andrybak