https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Template%3AUw-editsummary2Template:Uw-editsummary2 - Revision history2026-11-02T03:08:05ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.46.2https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Template:Uw-editsummary2&diff=131613&oldid=prevWikipedia>Axolitl: use safesubsts per WPUW recommendations2026-10-14T00:54:20Z<p>use safesubsts per WPUW recommendations</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{{icon|[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]]}}} Hello. I have noticed that you <noinclude>[https://xtools.wmcloud.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/Example often]</noinclude><includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />usertalk other|[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/{{safesubst:<noinclude />urlencode:{{safesubst:<noinclude />BASEPAGENAME}}|PATH}} often]|often}}</includeonly> edit without using an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Please do your best to {{strong|[[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through_editing|always fill in the summary field]]}}. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Explaining your reasoning for a change can also make it less likely to be reverted. Even [[Wikipedia:Edit summary legend/Quick reference|a short summary]] is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set {{Preferences|Editing|Editor|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}. {{{more|Thanks!}}} <!-- Template:Uw-editsummary2 --><noinclude><br />
{{Documentation}}<br />
</noinclude></div>Wikipedia>Axolitl