https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AReactive_Surface_Composite%2F%40comment-138.163.0.42-20150112181336Talk:Reactive Surface Composite/@comment-138.163.0.42-20150112181336 - Revision history2026-11-02T04:40:48ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.46.2https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reactive_Surface_Composite/@comment-138.163.0.42-20150112181336&diff=60739&oldid=prev138.163.0.42: Created page with "For the higher price, these armors should AT LEAST provide the same protection as military composite in their weaker area. Who would shell out that much money to be weaker aga..."2015-01-12T18:13:36Z<p>Created page with "For the higher price, these armors should AT LEAST provide the same protection as military composite in their weaker area. Who would shell out that much money to be weaker aga..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>For the higher price, these armors should AT LEAST provide the same protection as military composite in their weaker area. Who would shell out that much money to be weaker against the only other damage type?<br />
<br />
Does anyone know if it at least provides as much protection as reinforced armor against thermal?</div>138.163.0.42