<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AMulti-cannon%2F%40comment-176.249.62.114-20170810000800%2F%40comment-100.2.35.122-20180608145937</id>
	<title>Talk:Multi-cannon/@comment-176.249.62.114-20170810000800/@comment-100.2.35.122-20180608145937 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AMulti-cannon%2F%40comment-176.249.62.114-20170810000800%2F%40comment-100.2.35.122-20180608145937"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Multi-cannon/@comment-176.249.62.114-20170810000800/@comment-100.2.35.122-20180608145937&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-02T16:53:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Multi-cannon/@comment-176.249.62.114-20170810000800/@comment-100.2.35.122-20180608145937&amp;diff=100447&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>100.2.35.122: Created page with &quot;&gt;A Class 4 sounds scary, but a Class 4 cannon will seriously out DPS it.  In my experience this isn&#039;t the case.  Time on target with gimballed MCs while avoiding enemy fire n...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Multi-cannon/@comment-176.249.62.114-20170810000800/@comment-100.2.35.122-20180608145937&amp;diff=100447&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2018-06-08T14:59:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;gt;A Class 4 sounds scary, but a Class 4 cannon will seriously out DPS it.  In my experience this isn&amp;#039;t the case.  Time on target with gimballed MCs while avoiding enemy fire n...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;gt;A Class 4 sounds scary, but a Class 4 cannon will seriously out DPS it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my experience this isn&amp;#039;t the case.  Time on target with gimballed MCs while avoiding enemy fire not only creates more sustained fire but more concentrated shredding against internal modules.  What most people don&amp;#039;t realize is that the angle of attack against hull is extremely important.  Hitting a Federal Dropship from the front with MCs is worthless because the frontal angle creates like a 45 degree deflection at its absolute worse.  But if you&amp;#039;re flanking and hitting it from the side, the perpendicular angle means you can deal full, consistent damage creating absolute ripping DPS alongside penetration.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cannon might not have to work with that but unless you&amp;#039;re using gimbals, it&amp;#039;s harder to constantly be flanking and shooting at the same time, not to mention cannons have way less ammo to damage ratio than MCs.  An MC is a fast ship&amp;#039;s best friend if you want to focus purely on orbiting an enemy instead of trying to juggle pinpoint aiming with railguns and PAs alongside flanking. &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>100.2.35.122</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>