https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AMiner%2F%40comment-71.162.254.15-20151228092712%2F%40comment-5959508-20151228114612Talk:Miner/@comment-71.162.254.15-20151228092712/@comment-5959508-20151228114612 - Revision history2026-11-03T10:21:55ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.46.2https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Miner/@comment-71.162.254.15-20151228092712/@comment-5959508-20151228114612&diff=81823&oldid=prevFandom>JazHaz at 11:48, 28 December 20152015-12-28T11:48:02Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Probably because mining is a means to an end of getting money to eventually afford an Anaconda. Once you have one you don't really need to go mining. Of course you can go mining in an Anaconda, just like any other activity, but its sheer size, poor manoeuverbility and huge cargo bays that take a long time to fill with mining fragments probably makes the Anaconda not exactly an ideal ship for mining. Smaller, more nimble ships are thus better suited to this activity.<br />
<br />
For the same reasons, it could probably be argued that the Python should be removed from the list of ideal ships.</div>Fandom>JazHaz