95.45.48.113: Created page with "@[http://elite-dangerous.wikia.com/wiki/User:Shader_UA Shader UA] Hehe, this guy trying to say the Cutter is easy pray is so clearly bitter about never being able to own one ..."

2015-11-27T02:37:11Z

Created page with "@[http://elite-dangerous.wikia.com/wiki/User:Shader_UA Shader UA] Hehe, this guy trying to say the Cutter is easy pray is so clearly bitter about never being able to own one ..."

New page

@[http://elite-dangerous.wikia.com/wiki/User:Shader_UA Shader UA]

Hehe, this guy trying to say the Cutter is easy pray is so clearly bitter about never being able to own one and is trying to make excuses to feel better.

But one thing I must correct about what you said in one of your posts - The cutter '''*is*''' meant to be a warship, not a trader. FD have specifically said on stream that it's meant to be the Imperial '''*Navy's*''' equivilant to the corvette. It wouldn't be fair if only one side got a warship while the other side is stuck with a trader and forced to fly the enemy's ships instead. They're both meant to be combat orientated versions of the anaconda, but they screwed up the design of the cutter and made it way too good at trading when it's non-combat uses are only meant to extend to diplomatic and support roles. Something I truly hope they remidy before 2.0's release. I dread the thought of what will essentially be army tanks used as inter-city taxi cabs...

Talk:Imperial Cutter/@comment-31.46.251.244-20151123164417/@comment-95.45.48.113-20151127023711 - Revision history

95.45.48.113: Created page with "@[http://elite-dangerous.wikia.com/wiki/User:Shader_UA Shader UA] Hehe, this guy trying to say the Cutter is easy pray is so clearly bitter about never being able to own one ..."