<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AImperial_Cutter%2F%40comment-212.59.37.193-20151119090944%2F%40comment-212.59.37.193-20151123091901</id>
	<title>Talk:Imperial Cutter/@comment-212.59.37.193-20151119090944/@comment-212.59.37.193-20151123091901 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AImperial_Cutter%2F%40comment-212.59.37.193-20151119090944%2F%40comment-212.59.37.193-20151123091901"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Imperial_Cutter/@comment-212.59.37.193-20151119090944/@comment-212.59.37.193-20151123091901&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-02T15:08:23Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Imperial_Cutter/@comment-212.59.37.193-20151119090944/@comment-212.59.37.193-20151123091901&amp;diff=79438&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>212.59.37.193: Created page with &quot;  So, by your definition, a slow-turning battleship in WWI or WWII would have been useless and should have been refitted as a freighter?  I agree so far as this ship won&#039;t be ...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Imperial_Cutter/@comment-212.59.37.193-20151119090944/@comment-212.59.37.193-20151123091901&amp;diff=79438&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2015-11-23T09:19:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;  So, by your definition, a slow-turning battleship in WWI or WWII would have been useless and should have been refitted as a freighter?  I agree so far as this ship won&amp;#039;t be ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, by your definition, a slow-turning battleship in WWI or WWII would have been useless and should have been refitted as a freighter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree so far as this ship won&amp;#039;t be first choice in one-on-one-PVP. But in wing with 3 fast and manouverable smaller ships hunting solo players, it will prevent the opponent from low-wake due it&amp;#039;s huge mass lock factor - even most of the bigger ship types would need to high wake to escape. And with it&amp;#039;s heavy armament, it is a thread for nearly any other ship. Manouvrability? To shoot the back of a fleeing target you won&amp;#039;t need a good turning rate. More important for this role is the high speed of this ship - to get the target into weapon range and to maintain the mass lock.    &lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>212.59.37.193</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>