https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AFuel_Scoop%2F%40comment-5151386-20161215145225Talk:Fuel Scoop/@comment-5151386-20161215145225 - Revision history2026-11-03T06:28:02ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.46.2https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fuel_Scoop/@comment-5151386-20161215145225&diff=91012&oldid=prevFandom>Eagleeye81 at 14:55, 15 December 20162016-12-15T14:55:14Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I mainly do passenger and exploration missions and recently bought a 6B Fuel Scoop (752l/s) for my Python to reduce downtimes and dependencies of inhabited systems. What can I say... it's literally enough to surf by the star's halo on the way around it to the next hyperspace jump point. A ~20LY's worth of fuel consumption is therefore taken care of in a matter of seconds.<br />
<br />
The only downside to the Python in general is its increased mass in comparison to the ASP Explorer with the same FSD-maximum 5A, thus leading to reduced jump ranges. However, I will do a race with a friend in his fully upgraded ASP X, save a 3A Fuel Scoop, to determine who's faster: Me without any downtimes for fuel scooping or him with his superior jump range of 26LY. Stay tuned!</div>Fandom>Eagleeye81