<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AAlioth%2F%40comment-121.210.33.50-20180214025106%2F%40comment-46707274-20200823180323</id>
	<title>Talk:Alioth/@comment-121.210.33.50-20180214025106/@comment-46707274-20200823180323 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AAlioth%2F%40comment-121.210.33.50-20180214025106%2F%40comment-46707274-20200823180323"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alioth/@comment-121.210.33.50-20180214025106/@comment-46707274-20200823180323&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-02T17:50:25Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alioth/@comment-121.210.33.50-20180214025106/@comment-46707274-20200823180323&amp;diff=108513&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Fandom&gt;Blizzard36: Created page with &quot;Alioth was used as a &quot;popular&quot; name for the star prior to the IAU committee deciding to prioritize individual star names over the more &quot;scientific&quot; manner naming them by brigh...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alioth/@comment-121.210.33.50-20180214025106/@comment-46707274-20200823180323&amp;diff=108513&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2020-08-23T18:03:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Alioth was used as a &amp;quot;popular&amp;quot; name for the star prior to the IAU committee deciding to prioritize individual star names over the more &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; manner naming them by brigh...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Alioth was used as a &amp;quot;popular&amp;quot; name for the star prior to the IAU committee deciding to prioritize individual star names over the more &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; manner naming them by brightness within a constellation. So they just picked which of the existing names would be the new international official one. The Wikipedia entry is written in such a way that it makes it sound like they came up with a new name entirely while deprioritizing the conslelation system, and should probably be rewritten to show historical uses of that name like it does ones not adopted.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Fandom&gt;Blizzard36</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>