Elite Dangerous Wiki:Dispute - Revision history

Maintenance script: Reconcile Elite Dangerous community rules and Wikipedia-derived editorial guidance for the independent wiki; retain local layout

2026-10-31T19:23:46Z

Reconcile Elite Dangerous community rules and Wikipedia-derived editorial guidance for the independent wiki; retain local layout

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 31 October 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. Do not repeatedly revert a disputed change. Discuss the wording and evidence on the article talk page, following [[Project:Community standards]] and [[Project:Consensus]].		Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. Do not repeatedly revert a disputed change. Discuss the wording and evidence on the article talk page, following [[Project:Community standards]] and [[Project:Consensus]].

	When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t\|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. ~~The~~ ~~discussion~~ ~~should~~ ~~also~~ ~~have information about~~ the ~~different~~ ~~sides~~ ~~involved~~ and ~~why~~ ~~their~~ ~~facts~~ ~~are~~ ~~correct~~ or ~~why~~ ~~the~~ ~~other~~ ~~side's~~ ~~facts~~ ~~are~~ ~~incorrect~~.		When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t\|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. Identify the disputed statement, present the sources or reproducible tests, and propose wording that reflects the evidence. Separate a factual disagreement from a difference in writing style.

	When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place.		When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place.

			== While discussion continues ==
			Allow the response time required by [[Project:User Conduct Rules]]. Keep the discussion in one place and link it from any notice. Editors may still correct unrelated mistakes, improve references and remove harmful private information; a dispute notice does not freeze the whole article. Ask an uninvolved administrator to review persistent disruption or a request for protection. Administrators should not use protection to endorse their preferred version.

			Record the agreed wording or the reason for no change, then remove resolved notices. Follow [[Project:Deletion policy]] if removal of the whole page is proposed.

	[[Category:Policies]]		[[Category:Policies]]

Maintenance script: Align dispute guidance with local standards against edit warring

2026-10-31T09:18:59Z

Align dispute guidance with local standards against edit warring

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 31 October 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Shortcut\|ED:DISPUTE}}		{{Shortcut\|ED:DISPUTE}}
	Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. ~~When~~ a ~~dispute~~ ~~takes~~ ~~place,~~ the ~~article~~ ~~should~~ be ~~restored~~ to ~~how~~ it ~~was~~ ~~before~~ ~~the~~ ~~edits~~.		Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. Do not repeatedly revert a disputed change. Discuss the wording and evidence on the article talk page, following [[Project:Community standards]] and [[Project:Consensus]].

	When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t\|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. The discussion should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.		When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t\|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. The discussion should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.

Maintenance script: Localise template catalogue and editorial guidance for the independent wiki

2026-10-31T09:17:36Z

Localise template catalogue and editorial guidance for the independent wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 31 October 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Shortcut\|ED:DISPUTE}}		{{Shortcut\|ED:DISPUTE}}
	Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on ~~each-others~~ ~~message~~ ~~wall,~~ if ~~there~~ ~~are~~ ~~more~~ ~~than~~ ~~two~~ ~~people~~ ~~involved~~ the discussion ~~should take place on the [[Special:Forum\|Forum]]~~. When a dispute takes place, the article should be restored to how it was before the edits.		Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on the affected article's talk page, so all involved editors can follow the same discussion. When a dispute takes place, the article should be restored to how it was before the edits.

	When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t\|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the ~~discussion~~ ~~forum~~ ~~post in question~~. The ~~forum post~~ should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.		When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t\|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the relevant talk-page section. The discussion should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.

	When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place.		When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place.

Fandom>Kyouko Bot: Bot: Automated import of articles

2015-07-04T23:29:21Z

Bot: Automated import of articles

New page

{{Shortcut|ED:DISPUTE}}
Whenever there is a '''dispute''' between users over structural or factual changes of an article page, the contents in question should be discussed on each-others message wall, if there are more than two people involved the discussion should take place on the [[Special:Forum|Forum]]. When a dispute takes place, the article should be restored to how it was before the edits.

When an article is under a factual dispute, the {{t|Disputed}} template should be added at the very top of the article and link to the discussion forum post in question. The forum post should also have information about the different sides involved and why their facts are correct or why the other side's facts are incorrect.

When an article falls under a structural dispute, the article should not include a template, but the discussion should still take place.
[[Category:Policies]]