View source for Thread:82.224.162.129/@comment-82.224.162.129-20150319103158

I was pretty sure my edit was about to be removed by some fanboy, but by an admin... come on! Like most space games, E:D is DEFINITELY NOT a Newtonian space combat game. Claming that is a lie to anyone searching for a realistic space game and there is not need to be a physician to see this. Second and third law are obviously (and purposedly) broken in this game:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion

Readers of the FAQ deserve to be well informed about this, even brievly. E:D is close to be a Newtonian space combat game, but it is not because it is restricted to first law and there are three. Period.

You may think reality is not fun (like Frontier does), that's your subjective view, not mine. And definitely not the one of people looking for pure realism (FOR FUN, yes, some people really think reality IS fun), at least with respect to Newton, one of the most notable physicists of human history.

Now don't take it wrong. E:D breaks two Newton laws, this is a fact. Nevertheless, I think it's still a fun game. My edit was brief and informative. No judgements, negative statements or anything wrong... I did not even say the word "broken", just facts in one short sentence. Now you may think it was badly formulated or something... then fix it (english is not my native language, I agree), but don't remove the fact and lie to people. So you don't want people to know that E:D is just like most other space games in that regard? What's the point of a wiki tell me?<ac_metadata title="When will space games stop insulting Newton&#039;s laws?"> </ac_metadata>