Elite Dangerous Wiki - User contributions [en-gb]

Talk:Imperial Cutter/@comment-95.145.93.211-20151123223945

2015-11-23T22:39:45Z

95.145.93.211: Created page with "After spending a fair bit of time with both in the beta, I much prefer the Cutter to the Corvette. The only real downside for me is the manoeuverability. The tank on the C..."

After spending a fair bit of time with both in the beta, I much prefer the Cutter to the Corvette. The only real downside for me is the manoeuverability. The tank on the Cutter is just hilarious, and the straighline speed often makes up for its lack of agility in combat. I'm not really a hauler, but I put the cargo space to use picking up all the junk that killing ships tends to leave behind.

The Corvette's 2 Class 4s [i]seem[/i] cool until you realise firing both plasmaccs will melt your ship and the cannons struggle to hit anything smaller than Python. That all being said, some new Class 4 weapons would certainly make me reconsider, C4 Railgun? C4 BEAMS?!?!

Now that'd be something.

Talk:Imperial Cutter/@comment-95.145.93.211-20151120130058

2015-11-20T13:00:58Z

95.145.93.211: Created page with "I know its combat capabilities aren't THAT impressive (although the absurd shield strength means it can outlast most ships in a 1v1), but is everyone forgetting that it'll be ..."

I know its combat capabilities aren't THAT impressive (although the absurd shield strength means it can outlast most ships in a 1v1), but is everyone forgetting that it'll be able to launch 2 snub fighters once they add that functionality?

As a makeshift carrier, the more turret focused hardpoint layout and a focus on defense over offense makes a little more sense.

Talk:Federal Corvette/@comment-95.145.93.245-20150919212644

2015-09-19T21:26:44Z

95.145.93.245: Created page with "Cool as this looks, unless 1.5 brings in some Class 4 turrets those huge hardpoints are probably going to go waste..."

Cool as this looks, unless 1.5 brings in some Class 4 turrets those huge hardpoints are probably going to go waste...

Talk:Federation/@comment-95.145.93.231-20150908124017

2015-09-08T12:40:17Z

95.145.93.231: Created page with "I highly recommend anyone needing to increase rank with Federation or Empire has a read of this https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=165258&highlight=faction+rank ..."

I highly recommend anyone needing to increase rank with Federation or Empire has a read of this

https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=165258&highlight=faction+rank

Your reputation with your chosen faction is actually pretty irrelevant provided it's positive. But it DOES take a huge number of missions before the the naval promotion missions appear.

Personally, I've been camped in the same system doing charity missions over and over and I've currently just made it to chief petty officer, seems to be moving along.

Talk:Missile Rack/@comment-95.145.93.188-20150901135503

2015-09-01T13:55:03Z

95.145.93.188: Created page with "If these just had a bit more ammo they'd be fantastic. If you look at the models for the cannons and compare them to the missile launchers, the shells and the missiles should..."

If these just had a bit more ammo they'd be fantastic.

If you look at the models for the cannons and compare them to the missile launchers, the shells and the missiles should be simialar sizes. There's no reason you shouldn't be able to carry at least 50 or so. I also think they should be a little cheaper to re-arm, but honestly the cost doesn't bother me that much, and in fairness they should be way more expensive than other ammo due to all the guidance and flight systems installed on them.