<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=74.249.114.246</id>
	<title>Elite Dangerous Wiki - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=74.249.114.246"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/74.249.114.246"/>
	<updated>2026-11-02T04:01:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Python/@comment-187.64.91.253-20180921053417/@comment-74.249.114.246-20190219071642&amp;diff=104061</id>
		<title>Talk:Python/@comment-187.64.91.253-20180921053417/@comment-74.249.114.246-20190219071642</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Python/@comment-187.64.91.253-20180921053417/@comment-74.249.114.246-20190219071642&amp;diff=104061"/>
		<updated>2019-02-19T07:16:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;74.249.114.246: Created page with &amp;quot;Basically, yes.  Being able to land on medium pads means less time spent filling up cargo hold while running cargo missions.  Given that every single mission is just 1 jump,...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Basically, yes.  Being able to land on medium pads means less time spent filling up cargo hold while running cargo missions.  Given that every single mission is just 1 jump, time spent waiting on new missions to propogate is time utterly wasted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, having more cargo in a Conda is actually less profitable because it means any time you can&#039;t quickly fill it, you&#039;re left either wasting time waiting on more missions, or running with a half-empty hold.  (Or filling it with random comodities making 1/100th as much money.)  The nice thing about 280t Python is you can always, ALWAYS find enough missions to fill it within 20t of capacity in a single board refresh.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>74.249.114.246</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cannon/@comment-90.200.46.38-20181117013912/@comment-74.249.114.246-20190213195421&amp;diff=104021</id>
		<title>Talk:Cannon/@comment-90.200.46.38-20181117013912/@comment-74.249.114.246-20190213195421</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cannon/@comment-90.200.46.38-20181117013912/@comment-74.249.114.246-20190213195421&amp;diff=104021"/>
		<updated>2019-02-13T19:54:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;74.249.114.246: Created page with &amp;quot;I would agree with you about 99% of this.  The one thing I will say is that having a single corrosive MC is a good idea when using Class 1 cannons.  Why?  Because the armor...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I would agree with you about 99% of this.  The one thing I will say is that having a single corrosive MC is a good idea when using Class 1 cannons.  Why?  Because the armor piercing on class 1 weapons is so low.  However, with the combination of class 1 cannons and a single class 1 corrosive MC (for example, 2 cannons and 1 MC on an Eagle) your AP goes up enough to pierce ships like the DBX, where it otherwise wouldn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And if you put High Yield on the cannons, every single shot is going to damage multiple modules.  You can do insane amounts of damage to internals this way.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>74.249.114.246</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>