Elite Dangerous Wiki - User contributions [en-gb]

Talk:Type-10 Defender/@comment-49.255.202.34-20171227014757/@comment-49.255.202.34-20171228035049

2017-12-28T03:50:49Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "Has now been fixed."

Has now been fixed.

Talk:Type-10 Defender/@comment-49.255.202.34-20171227014757

2017-12-27T01:47:57Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "This article never indicates that the ship can fit a fighter hangar, which seems kinda like something that should be mentioned."

This article never indicates that the ship can fit a fighter hangar, which seems kinda like something that should be mentioned.

Talk:Type-10 Defender/@comment-192.136.161.33-20171222180540/@comment-49.255.202.34-20171227014257

2017-12-27T01:42:58Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "26 is higher than every ship bar the Cutter (27), to answer your question about the big three."

26 is higher than every ship bar the Cutter (27), to answer your question about the big three.

Talk:Type-10 Defender/@comment-192.136.161.33-20171222180540/@comment-49.255.202.34-20171227013844

2017-12-27T01:38:44Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "26, according to the sidebar - 10 more than the Type 9."

26, according to the sidebar - 10 more than the Type 9.

Talk:Asp Explorer/@comment-49.255.202.34-20170829230945

2017-08-29T23:09:45Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "There's almost nothing that can effectively interdict a well-fitted out Explorer; four pips to Engines and a good set of thrusters and it can just boost away from anything big..."

There's almost nothing that can effectively interdict a well-fitted out Explorer; four pips to Engines and a good set of thrusters and it can just boost away from anything big enough to mass-lock it. For that reason alone, plus its decent cargo cap and jump range, it makes an excellent small trader (or basically any other non-combat role, e.g. miner) before you can afford a Python or something else with a bit more combat effectiveness.

If you're not planning to fight that much, I'd recommend this as a good ship to save up for when you first start playing.

Talk:Pulse Disruptor/@comment-30387291-20170518091625/@comment-49.255.202.34-20170814230807

2017-08-14T23:08:07Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "(at least, that is the case with Scramble Spectrum weapons)"

(at least, that is the case with Scramble Spectrum weapons)

Talk:Pulse Disruptor/@comment-30387291-20170518091625/@comment-49.255.202.34-20170814230736

2017-08-14T23:07:36Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "Around 5 seconds, and there appears to be a cooldown of 10 seconds before you can trigger another malfunction."

Around 5 seconds, and there appears to be a cooldown of 10 seconds before you can trigger another malfunction.

Talk:Pulse Disruptor/@comment-49.255.202.34-20170814045041/@comment-49.255.202.34-20170814230640

2017-08-14T23:06:40Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "Sorry, after reading into it further that should read "the Disrupter only affects a module that is hit and damaged"."

Sorry, after reading into it further that should read "the Disrupter only affects a module that is hit and damaged".

Talk:Pulse Disruptor/@comment-49.255.202.34-20170814045041/@comment-49.255.202.34-20170814045348

2017-08-14T04:53:48Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "Answering my own question: the main difference is that SS weapons trigger ''random'' module malfunctions, the Disruptor only affects ''the module being targeted'' (no idea if ..."

Answering my own question: the main difference is that SS weapons trigger ''random'' module malfunctions, the Disruptor only affects ''the module being targeted'' (no idea if it does anything if you're not targetting a module directly). So the Disruptor is probably less useful except in the hands of someone who knows what they are doing.

Talk:Pulse Disruptor/@comment-49.255.202.34-20170814045041

2017-08-14T04:50:41Z

49.255.202.34: Created page with "How does this differ from the Scramble Spectrum special effect?"

How does this differ from the Scramble Spectrum special effect?