Elite Dangerous Wiki - User contributions [en-gb]

Talk:HUD/Left/@comment-2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F-20200203144111/@comment-2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F-20200203144625

2020-02-03T14:46:25Z

2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F: Created page with "scratch that"

scratch that

Talk:HUD/Left/@comment-2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F-20200203144111

2020-02-03T14:41:11Z

2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F: Created page with "anyone else having issues with the messy state these menus are in? e.g. if I scan too many moons, and have "planets and moons" as well as "points of interests" on, then findi..."

anyone else having issues with the messy state these menus are in?

e.g. if I scan too many moons, and have "planets and moons" as well as "points of interests" on, then finding anything in between those gets a real sore. maybe I am only interested in hotspots? - maybe only in geological sites? - but I can either show both or non, and so one category downs out the other.

Another thing that really annoys me is the transaction/mission menu; no sorting options at all? (for distance, time remaining, rewards; when stacking missions this becomes a sore to navigate through, also; in fact: I'd much prefer having a table that lists such details directly, w/o having to look into each and every entry manually) - seems like they made this cumbersome on purpose, or FDev are entirely dumb/incompetent/lazy. Either way there is no excuse for that, as this sort of feature could be dealt with in a few hours AT MOST!

Talk:Super Penetrator/@comment-90.200.46.38-20181127121900/@comment-2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F-20200203140012

2020-02-03T14:00:12Z

2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F: Created page with "... whilst the piercing value actually stays the same. ED-logic ... The way "targetting" modules (via panel, rme) works in this game is too cartoonish anyway. Same with the..."

... whilst the piercing value actually stays the same.

ED-logic ...

The way "targetting" modules (via panel, rme) works in this game is too cartoonish anyway. Same with the interdiction mechanic, which may as well be copied from "Starlink" or some stupid game like that, if that one did not come out later...

Talk:Railgun/@comment-2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F-20200203135644

2020-02-03T13:56:44Z

2003:DB:F70F:D637:D8F0:DEB9:B7A2:F93F: Created page with "I'm confused with some of the listed stats (in game) for this weapon. It says it had a) a reload time of 1s [with a clip size of 1] and it did also have b) a RoF of 1.2/s ..."

I'm confused with some of the listed stats (in game) for this weapon.
It says it had

a) a reload time of 1s [with a clip size of 1]

and it did also have

b) a RoF of 1.2/s

...how exactly does that work?
If it takes O N E second to reload, the RoF cannot be ANY higher than ONE per second.

What gives?

If anthing, the RoF would have to be noticably below 1/s, considering the noticable delay/loadup when firing up the weapon...
am I to believe, that there was an inate autoloader, that does not get mentioned for some reason?!?

PS: I know that high capacity can double the clip size, but at the same time the listed RoF changes with it, which still leaves this contradiction in.