https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=188.238.155.36 2026-11-01T06:01:50Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.46.2 https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beluga_Liner/@comment-188.238.155.231-20161029104922/@comment-188.238.155.36-20161219181029&diff=91090 2016-12-19T18:10:30Z

<p>188.238.155.36: Created page with &quot;Thank you for the explanation! I do have the Beluga and love its massiveness, but it&#039;s quite disappointing that even with the same hull mass the mass lock factor is nowhere ne...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>Thank you for the explanation! I do have the Beluga and love its massiveness, but it's quite disappointing that even with the same hull mass the mass lock factor is nowhere near the Cutter's and I'm suffering from other ships' presence when attempting to supercruise, especially after some Anaconda has interdicted me...<br /> <br /> I own one Anaconda too, and do know that its modules can get very heavy compared to its hull mass, but even though if the mass lock factor is determined by the actual mass, and the factor listed on these pages is the default value for each ship, I think the Beluga shouldn't lose to the Anaconda by that much (18 vs. 23). Also the Cutter has a value of 27 listed on its page, but even though it has much bigger optional module slots the default loadout shouldn't be that much heavier than the Beluga's. Cutter has bigger power plant, but the same FSD and engines I think.</div>

188.238.155.36