Elite Dangerous Wiki - User contributions [en-gb]

Talk:Imperial Eagle/@comment-187.64.110.30-20180129061043/@comment-187.64.110.30-20180204020842

2018-02-04T02:08:43Z

187.64.110.30: Created page with "^ Because a god damn Vulture can take several seconds of turret damage untill you find that sweat spot between speed and handling, once you do that, the fight is over. Peop..."

^

Because a god damn Vulture can take several seconds of turret damage untill you find that sweat spot between speed and handling, once you do that, the fight is over.

People in this community come up with the dumbest examples into arguments. The other day someone tried to reason with me that a Federal Assault Ship was balanced against the other ships in the game because he could take it out WITH ANOTHER FEDERAL ASSAULT SHIP.

Talk:Imperial Courier/@comment-187.64.110.30-20180204015625

2018-02-04T01:56:25Z

187.64.110.30: Created page with "Too bad it had to look like an aerodynamic toilet seat. Or a fat Imperial Eagle."

Too bad it had to look like an aerodynamic toilet seat. Or a fat Imperial Eagle.

Talk:Imperial Cutter/@comment-72.241.147.127-20180125172543/@comment-187.64.110.30-20180204005145

2018-02-04T00:51:45Z

187.64.110.30: Created page with "And yet... the Federation is the one full of cocksuckers."

And yet... the Federation is the one full of cocksuckers.

Talk:Imperial Eagle/@comment-187.64.110.30-20180129061043

2018-01-29T06:10:43Z

187.64.110.30: Created page with "Tried everything I could find out. +650 burst builds. Went back and forth so many times into the engineers, getting materials, scanning shit for the datas, engineering my iE..."

Tried everything I could find out. +650 burst builds. Went back and forth so many times into the engineers, getting materials, scanning shit for the datas, engineering my iEagle to be lighter and faster. Guns to sustain dps for longer. So many combinations of FAoff + boost turns + vertical thrusters. Everything I do to this ship looks great untill that one momment when <span style="font-weight:400;">npcs start pulling the boost + axis turn + facetank all my attempts to get on its tail. Boost turn, it's facing me. boost turn twice or three times on a row, the damn Viper mk3/FAS is still face tanking me.</span>

Got a Fully engineered Imperial Clipper that can destroy almost every ship in the game by ramming them with shields on pips and spamming fragment cannons at "melee" range. The thing is... I love the Eagle's design. But I give up. I don't want your god damn Cutter, Carrier, Anaconda nor a bunch of ships that don't compare with the Eagle's lines.

Large ships get all sorts of status boosts with Engineers, they simply gain everything without loss. The Eagles... get to trade dmg and hull for speed at best.

<span style="font-weight:400;">All That said... Fuck you Frontier Development.</span>

Talk:Imperial Clipper/@comment-187.64.110.30-20180125185956

2018-01-25T18:59:56Z

187.64.110.30: Created page with "This ship gives me the most mixed feelings... It's good but far from great. A huge ship but it doesn't really sit on those tiers. Great handling but it drifts away if you tur..."

This ship gives me the most mixed feelings...

It's good but far from great. A huge ship but it doesn't really sit on those tiers. Great handling but it drifts away if you turn it too fast... Great speed but it takes a while to accelerate, specially if you make the quick turn... needs to rely a lot of on thursting, but so can every other ship with power distributors above 3A...

Good grade Hard points but they stand so far away from its center that trying to use fixed hard points will make you MISS (a small ship is very likely to stay within the gap between 2 fixed beams passing through its sides), unless you purposely put hard points only on one side of the ship and try to aim with just that...

Supposedly a ship for transport... but it EATS TOO MUCH FUEL. An Explorer costs less than half the CLipper's price and can make jumps all the way out of the bubble without relying on fuel scoop neither extra tanks

Talk:Imperial Clipper/@comment-95.150.153.134-20170728151244/@comment-187.64.110.30-20180120211833

2018-01-20T21:18:33Z

187.64.110.30: Created page with "Frontier's bullshit lore reasoning to justify a broken balance system. That's the trend behind the underdog game developers. Use excuses to justify unbalance. Instead of the ..."

Frontier's bullshit lore reasoning to justify a broken balance system.

That's the trend behind the underdog game developers. Use excuses to justify unbalance. Instead of the rather obvious/required value tinkering.

Talk:Federal Assault Ship/@comment-179.154.69.83-20180116024517/@comment-187.64.110.30-20180120210149

2018-01-20T21:01:49Z

187.64.110.30: Created page with "Reasoning? I don't need reasoning to hate unbalanced game content. To all the Federal cocksuckers. Shove it up your ass and fire all of its 300 hundred hardpoints untill it..."

Reasoning?

I don't need reasoning to hate unbalanced game content.

To all the Federal cocksuckers.

Shove it up your ass and fire all of its 300 hundred hardpoints untill it explodes on overheating.