<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=15.203.226.42</id>
	<title>Elite Dangerous Wiki - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=15.203.226.42"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/15.203.226.42"/>
	<updated>2026-10-31T15:55:49Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Diamondback_Explorer/@comment-15.203.226.42-20170907085509&amp;diff=96759</id>
		<title>Talk:Diamondback Explorer/@comment-15.203.226.42-20170907085509</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Diamondback_Explorer/@comment-15.203.226.42-20170907085509&amp;diff=96759"/>
		<updated>2017-09-07T08:55:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;15.203.226.42: Created page with &amp;quot;The Diamondback Explorer has one drawback. Full deep space exploration kit means no cargo space for bringing back juicy finds, and also no shields either.  The series itself i...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Diamondback Explorer has one drawback. Full deep space exploration kit means no cargo space for bringing back juicy finds, and also no shields either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The series itself is one major mistake: Explorers don&#039;t need fatter, heavier slots, they need more smaller slots for stellar/survey scanners and extended survival equipment like AFM&#039;s. Slapping an Advanced Discovery Scanner and a Detailed Surface Scanner in size 3 slots is just design incompetance.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>15.203.226.42</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Diamondback_Scout/@comment-15.203.226.42-20170907071001&amp;diff=96755</id>
		<title>Talk:Diamondback Scout/@comment-15.203.226.42-20170907071001</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://elite.mistflux.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Diamondback_Scout/@comment-15.203.226.42-20170907071001&amp;diff=96755"/>
		<updated>2017-09-07T07:10:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;15.203.226.42: Created page with &amp;quot;A tiny ship with the name inspiring explorers, this is actually a terrible space exploration ship. It simply lacks the space to do anything else but fly and scan in that regar...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A tiny ship with the name inspiring explorers, this is actually a terrible space exploration ship. It simply lacks the space to do anything else but fly and scan in that regards. What it actually excels at is planetary operation, offering just enough internal space for the rover, fair cargo bay space, &amp;amp; shields systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The narrow band forward turrets are also good for dumbfire missiles for base assult missions as well, and two medium turrets for shooing off space pests.  The Scout is a no more, no less minimalist approach when it comes to planetary exploration.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>15.203.226.42</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>